Nepotism Ahoy!
Pages for a new History of Political Cartooning in Denmark
Peter Klæstrup, Folkets Nisse, No. 12, March 24, 1866. The journalist C.V. Rimestad on the Sisyphean task of getting Heyman elected. |
Taking bribery and everyone soon knowing about it was the end of Pjerrot and a special tale in that we have but few of them in this country and we wanted to know more, all the wicked details, which the contemporaries gossiped about and never bothered to write down.
This week, however, when I was searching for something completely different, I found another story of the same kind and even worse: This time the payment went in the opposite direction.
There are many sordid details to that story, so I better begin in another place just to set the tone of the day before we shall be digging into the tale itself in the next blog post.
Peter Klæstrup, Folkets Nisse, No. 64, May 21, 1852. |
The decade and a half from the first Constitution in 1849 to 1865, when Heyman paid to remain unseen, saw two futile wars against Germany, neither of which should have been and both of which were only too typical of an atmosphere of fighting for power in a new societal system.
The scene above is mocking those who can only look on in silent protest, Pjerrot to the left, and Hr. Sørensen (i.e. the prototype of the Dane) at the time of the first - and successful (and long since dismissed) - reduction of the constitutional rights as shown in the headless puppet of the Constitution on the floor. The two outside the scene are made up of soft ineffectual lines, while the puppet and Reaction as bride are all about sharp bending to their knees. The frustration is ripe.
Peter Klæstrup for Folkets Nisse, No. 43 October 27, 1866. |
This is incidentally an instance in which the nightcap of Mr. Sørensen reveals itself as the offspring of the Phrygian cap of the French revolution.
Peter Klæstrup for Folkets Nisse, No. 49, February 14, 1852. The voter is on the right, his local MP to the left. |
Even at the worst of arguing as to the left and below, this is democracy at its best, confronting the men of Parliament on their responsibility. As Nadia Khiari has put it from the Tunisian perspective: Everyone was talking, talking, talking. The word had been set free.
Peter Klæstrup, Folkets Nisse, No. 62, May 15, 1852. |
Knud Gamborg, Pjerrot, 1865. Photo: Erik Petri. |
The new king arrived by way of London as stated on his luggage. The London Treaty of 1852 had established him as the successor to the Danish throne when its predecessor remained childless. Christian IX was selected among a number of nephews of younger siblings, or one niece in particular as it turned out, who then turned over the honor of ruling the country to her husband. He grew up in Germany, or almost, or...
Peter Klæstrup, Folkets Nisse, No. 51 December 17, 1864. "My King! With permission to ask if my King thinks and feels in Danish?" |
With such an intricate dance as that, why not abolish the royal house altogether? It had an air of horse-trading to it, which seemed unworthy in a modern society, as became the constant theme of the political cartooning of the day.
For one thing royal houses bring a trail of nepotism with them. The obvious ones are but the least of the problem:
Peter Klæstrup, Folkets Nisse, No. 64, May 21, 1852. "- General Hans! What will you be doing today? - General Julius - Nothing! And you? - I shall assist you!" |
Peter Klæstrup, Folkets Nisse, No. 43, October 27, 1866. Bismarck having been ill was once again top of his game, containing smaller kingdoms. |
These two had served in the Prussian army, which just five minutes before had been fighting the Danes, cough..... bowing in reverence to these two, one might as well be bowing to Bismarck:
In the midst of all of this, the two monocled donkeys to the left below are what our story shall be about: